When it comes to managing public relations (PR), businesses often face an important decision: should they build an in-house PR team or hire an external PR agency? Both options come with their own set of advantages and challenges, making the decision largely dependent on a company’s goals, budget, and the specific demands of their industry. In this blog post, we’ll explore the key differences between in-house PR and agency PR to help you make the right choice for your business.
Table of Contents
What is In-house PR?
In-house PR refers to a dedicated team or individual employee in a company to manage its public relations efforts. This team works exclusively for the brand, handling everything from media outreach and crisis management to event planning and content creation.
Benefits of in-house PR
Deep Brand Understanding
In-house teams have an intimate knowledge of the brand’s values, mission, and culture. This enables them to create highly aligned messaging and respond quickly to challenges or opportunities.
Faster Response Times
Being part of the organisation allows in-house PR professionals to act swiftly, especially during crises or time-sensitive campaigns. They’re always on hand and do not need to get up to speed on the brand’s specifics.
Cost Efficiency for Long-Term Needs
For companies with ongoing PR needs, hiring an in-house team may be more cost-effective than paying retainer fees to an agency.
Exclusive Focus
Unlike an agency that juggles multiple clients, in-house PR professionals focus solely on the success of one brand.
Challenges of in-house PR
Limited Resources
Smaller in-house teams may lack the specialised skills, industry connections, or tools that larger agencies can provide.
Creative Stagnation
Without external perspectives, in-house teams may fall into groupthink or struggle to generate fresh, innovative ideas.
Difficulty Scaling
Expanding an in-house team to meet the needs of a major campaign or crisis can be costly and time-consuming.
What is agency PR?
PR agencies are third-party firms specialising in public relations. They work with multiple clients across various industries, offering expertise in media relations, campaign management, and strategic communications.
Benefits of agency PR
Broad Expertise
Agencies employ diverse professionals with specialised skills in areas such as digital PR, influencer marketing, and crisis management. They also bring insights from working with clients in different industries.
Established Media Relationships
Agencies often have longstanding relationships with journalists, influencers, and media outlets, which can be leveraged to secure coverage more effectively.
Scalability
Agencies have the capacity to quickly ramp up efforts for large campaigns or high-pressure situations. They can also draw on their network of resources to meet specific needs.
Fresh Perspectives
Working with an agency brings an outsider’s view, which can result in innovative ideas and approaches that an in-house team might not consider.
Cost Flexibility
While agencies can be expensive, many offer flexible pricing structures, including project-based contracts, which can be appealing for brands with short-term or seasonal PR needs.
Challenges of agency PR
Limited Brand Immersion
Since agencies work with multiple clients, they may not have the same depth of understanding of your brand as an in-house team.
Less Control
With an external partner, companies might feel they have less direct oversight over day-to-day PR activities or how their brand is represented.
Potentially Higher Costs
Retainers or hourly fees can add up, making agencies less cost-effective for companies with consistent, year-round PR demands.
Divided Attention
Since agencies juggle several clients, there’s a risk your brand may not always be the top priority.
Considerations when choosing between in-house and agency
Budget
If your company has the resources to invest in building a robust in-house team, it may be worth pursuing. However, if you need expertise across multiple areas without the cost of hiring full-time specialists, an agency might be more economical.
Scope of Work
For consistent, ongoing PR needs, an in-house team offers better long-term value. If your PR needs are sporadic or you require a one-off campaign, an agency is better suited.
Industry Connections
If media relationships are critical to your PR strategy, an agency’s established connections can make a significant difference.
Flexibility and Scalability
Agencies excel in scaling efforts for large campaigns or crises, while in-house teams are limited by their size and resources.
Creative Needs
If your team struggles with fresh ideas, an agency can inject creativity and innovation into your strategy.
The Best of Both Worlds?
Many companies opt for a hybrid approach, maintaining a small in-house PR team to manage day-to-day tasks and partnering with an agency for specialised campaigns or crises.
This model allows businesses to enjoy the benefits of both approaches while minimizing their downsides.
Conclusion
Deciding between in-house and agency PR ultimately depends on your brand’s unique needs, goals, and resources. In-house PR provides brand-focused expertise and control, while agencies bring industry knowledge, scalability, and creativity.
By carefully evaluating your priorities and considering a hybrid model, if necessary, you can build a PR strategy that positions your brand for long-term success. For more information on how you can ensure that you have the right level of PR support for your business, whether in-house or agency, contact the team at Modo25, send us an email to team@modo25.com.
